> -----Original Message----- > From: David Miller [mailto:da...@davemloft.net] > Sent: 30 November 2013 21:10 > To: Zoltan Kiss > Cc: Ian Campbell; Wei Liu; xen-de...@lists.xenproject.org; > net...@vger.kernel.org; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; Jonathan Davies; > Paul Durrant > Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] xen-netback: Fix pull size in > checksum_setup_ip* > > From: Zoltan Kiss <zoltan.k...@citrix.com> > Date: Fri, 29 Nov 2013 18:56:47 +0000 > > > Before checksum setup we need to make sure we have enough data in > linear > > buffer, so we do a pull if not. The calculation of the required data counts > > with skb->network_header, which is the headroom size actually. This is not > > necessary, and can cause unreasonable pulling. I've also removed > > MAX_IPOPTLEN, as we only need the base header at that point. > > > > Signed-off-by: Zoltan Kiss <zoltan.k...@citrix.com> > > The net-next tree is no open, therefore it is not appropriate to submit > patches targetting to that tree at this time. > > I will make an explicit announcement on netdev when I have openned > the net-next tree, so it will be clear exactly when you can submit > patches targetting that tree again. > > Thank you.
I think this patch should be for net rather than net-next anyway. Since it appears that maybe_pull_tail() has bigger problems I'll incorporate this fix as part of v4 of the fix for fragment detection. Paul -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
