> >>[...] > >>>+void ux500_msp_populate_dai_drv(struct snd_soc_dai_driver > >>>*ux500_msp_dai_drv) > >>>+{ > >>>+ ux500_msp_dai_drv->probe = ux500_msp_dai_probe; > >>>+ ux500_msp_dai_drv->suspend = NULL; > >>>+ ux500_msp_dai_drv->resume = NULL; > >>>+ ux500_msp_dai_drv->playback.channels_min = UX500_MSP_MIN_CHANNELS; > >>>+ ux500_msp_dai_drv->playback.channels_max = UX500_MSP_MAX_CHANNELS; > >>>+ ux500_msp_dai_drv->playback.rates = UX500_I2S_RATES; > >>>+ ux500_msp_dai_drv->playback.formats = UX500_I2S_FORMATS; > >>>+ ux500_msp_dai_drv->capture.channels_min = UX500_MSP_MIN_CHANNELS; > >>>+ ux500_msp_dai_drv->capture.channels_max = UX500_MSP_MAX_CHANNELS; > >>>+ ux500_msp_dai_drv->capture.rates = UX500_I2S_RATES; > >>>+ ux500_msp_dai_drv->capture.formats = UX500_I2S_FORMATS; > >>>+ ux500_msp_dai_drv->ops = ux500_msp_dai_ops; > >>> }; > >> > >>You can just use the same static driver for all devices. No need to > >>dynamically allocate it. > > > >How do you mean? Just create a 'static struct' instead? > > Yes. > > static struct snd_soc_dai_driver ux500_msp_dai_driver = { > ... > };
Yes, that's no issue. I was more focused on the reduction of code than anything else, but that is a better idea. I'll resubmit. -- Lee Jones Linaro STMicroelectronics Landing Team Lead Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/