On Tue, Dec 03, 2013 at 06:01:50PM +0100, Borislav Petkov wrote: > Date: Tue, 3 Dec 2013 18:01:50 +0100 > From: Borislav Petkov <b...@alien8.de> > To: "Chen, Gong" <gong.c...@linux.intel.com> > Cc: Levente Kurusa <le...@linux.com>, Ingo Molnar <mi...@kernel.org>, > Thomas Gleixner <t...@linutronix.de>, Tony Luck <tony.l...@intel.com>, "H. > Peter Anvin" <h...@zytor.com>, x...@kernel.org, EDAC > <linux-e...@vger.kernel.org>, LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org> > Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86: mcheck: call put_device on device_register failure > User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) > > Can you please fix your > > Mail-Followup-To: > > header? It is impossible to reply to your emails without fiddling with > the To: and Cc: by hand which gets very annoying over time.
I add some configs in my muttrc. Hope it works. > > On Mon, Dec 02, 2013 at 09:23:30PM -0500, Chen, Gong wrote: > > I have some concerns about it. if device_register is failed, it will > > backtraces all kinds of conditions automatically, including put_device > > definately. So do we really need an extra put_device when it returns > > failure? > > Do you mean the "done:" label in device_add() which does put_device() > and which gets called by device_register()? > Not only. I noticed that another put_device under label "Error:".
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
