* Linus Torvalds <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I can do ppc64 myself, can others fix the other architectures (Ingo,
> shouldn't the UP case have the read/write_can_lock() cases too? And
> wouldn't you agree that it makes more sense to have the rwlock test
> variants in asm/rwlock.h?):
You are right about UP, and the patch below adds the UP variants. It's
analogous to the existing wrapping concept that UP 'spinlocks' are
always unlocked on UP. (spin_can_lock() is already properly defined on
UP too.)
Ingo
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--- linux/include/linux/spinlock.h.orig
+++ linux/include/linux/spinlock.h
@@ -228,6 +228,9 @@ typedef struct {
#define rwlock_yield(lock) (void)(lock)
+#define read_can_lock(lock) (((void)(lock), 1))
+#define write_can_lock(lock) (((void)(lock), 1))
+
#define _spin_trylock(lock) ({preempt_disable(); _raw_spin_trylock(lock) ? \
1 : ({preempt_enable(); 0;});})
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
