Hello, On Thu, Dec 05, 2013 at 06:35:00PM +0200, Grygorii Strashko wrote: > >> +#define memblock_virt_alloc_align(x, align) \ > >> + memblock_virt_alloc_try_nid(x, align, BOOTMEM_LOW_LIMIT, \ > >> + BOOTMEM_ALLOC_ACCESSIBLE, MAX_NUMNODES) > > > > Also, do we really need this align variant separate when the caller > > can simply specify 0 for the default? > > Unfortunately Yes. > We need it to keep compatibility with bootmem/nobootmem > which don't handle 0 as default align value.
Hmm... why wouldn't just interpreting 0 to SMP_CACHE_BYTES in the memblock_virt*() function work? Thanks. -- tejun -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
