Hey, On Thu, Dec 05, 2013 at 06:48:21PM +0000, Strashko, Grygorii wrote: > +/* Fall back to all the existing bootmem APIs */ > +#define memblock_virt_alloc(x) \ > + __alloc_bootmem(x, SMP_CACHE_BYTES, BOOTMEM_LOW_LIMIT) > > which will be transformed to > +/* Fall back to all the existing bootmem APIs */ > +#define memblock_virt_alloc(x, align) \ > + __alloc_bootmem(x, align, BOOTMEM_LOW_LIMIT) > > and used as > > memblock_virt_alloc(size, 0); > > so, by default bootmem code will use 0 as default alignment and not > SMP_CACHE_BYTES > and that is wrong.
Just translate it to SMP_CACHE_BYTES? Am I missing something here? You're defining a new API which wraps around two interfaces. Wrap them so that they show the same desired behavior? -- tejun -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
