On 12/4/13, 12:39 AM, Masami Hiramatsu wrote: > What would you like to do with perf probe? Direct address accessing for > userspace is not a good way to do, because userspace is relocatable...
Masami, I am referring to the address within the executable which is what perf-probe pushes to the kernel. > >> For now I will carry the patch locally. At this point I am 20 patches >> deep and have probably another 20 to go. What's one more. I'll come back >> to this when I have more time. > > Would you have any public git repository for that? https://github.com/dsahern/linux/tree/perf-full-monty And could you share > us what would you like to do before sending patch? We can help you to > tell the best way. I want to save myself some time and effort by giving the relative address with an executable. That allows me to probe any function, and I want to do it from a consistent user interface -- perf-probe. With the proposed patch I have that. David -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
