>Reviewed-by: Dave Martin <dave.mar...@arm.com> > >I can confirm that the kernel "doesn't crash" with this applied, and >that backtracing at least partially works. But this is not really >sufficient to demontrate that the now code works better than the old >code in corner cases (which is the point of the patch). > >Can you give details of what additional testing you have, or plan to >do?
We saw a data abort in unwinder for one of Samsung Project, during a Samsung Automation test case. After that I created the initial the patch, and the data abort has not been seen till now. Is it possible for you to give an idea on what other kind of additional testing do you have in mind. Regads Anurag
