On Tue, 10 Dec 2013, Namhyung Kim wrote: > Hi Vince, > Okay, the reason I set the bit was consideration of a very strict > perf_event_paranoid setting (-2). > > So maybe we can try it again with the bit cleared after a failure, or > checking the paranoid setting first.
If perf_event_paranoid is set to 2 then you should get EPERM rather than ENOENT or EINVAL, right? Maybe that could be used too. As a side note, why doesn't paranoid 2 block events that don't have exclude_hv set? Vince -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
