On 10 December 2013 15:00, Krzysztof Kozlowski <k.kozlow...@samsung.com> wrote:
> On Tue, 2013-12-10 at 14:48 +0530, Sachin Kamat wrote:
>> Hi Krzysztof,
>>
>> On 10 December 2013 14:39, Krzysztof Kozlowski <k.kozlow...@samsung.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>> > static int s5m8767_reg_disable(struct regulator_dev *rdev)
>> > {
>> > struct s5m8767_info *s5m8767 = rdev_get_drvdata(rdev);
>> > int ret, reg;
>> > - int mask = 0xc0, enable_ctrl;
>> > + int mask = S5M8767_ENCTRL_MASK, enable_ctrl;
>>
>> Couldn't we get rid of this mask variable here too?
>>
>> Otherwise the patch looks good to me.
>
> Not in this patch because it leads to warning:
>
> drivers/regulator/s5m8767.c: In function ‘s5m8767_reg_disable’:
> drivers/regulator/s5m8767.c:259:2: warning: large integer implicitly
> truncated to unsigned type [-Woverflow]
> drivers/regulator/s5m8767.c:253:6: warning: unused variable ‘mask’
> [-Wunused-variable]
I see.
>
> I plan to remove the sec_reg_*() helpers because they are confusing
> and error-prone (mixing u8 and unsigned int). After using standard regmap
> API this "mask" variable could be removed.
Sounds good.
For the subject patch,
Reviewed-by: Sachin Kamat <sachin.ka...@linaro.org>
--
With warm regards,
Sachin
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
