On Tue, Dec 10, 2013 at 04:45:06PM +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote: > > * Tejun Heo <t...@kernel.org> wrote: > > > On Tue, Dec 03, 2013 at 05:32:45PM -0600, Christoph Lameter wrote: > > > The patches following this one will add preemption checks to __this_cpu > > > ops so we need to have an alternative way to use this_cpu operations > > > without preemption checks. > > > > > > raw_cpu_ops will be the basis for all other ops since these will be the > > > operations that do not implement any checks. > > > > > > Primitive operations are renamed by this patch from __this_cpu_xxx to > > > raw_cpu_xxxx. > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Christoph Lameter <c...@linux.com> > > > > Applied to percpu/for-3.14. > > Please also pick up the related debugging bits: > > [PATCH 18/41] percpu: Add preemption checks to __this_cpu ops > > as we don't want to expand percpu ops without doing proper debugging.
Yeah, trying to figure out which should go through which tree. Christoph, should I also pickup 14? Or can that go through x86? Thanks. -- tejun -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
