* Christoph Lameter <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Tue, 10 Dec 2013, Ingo Molnar wrote:
>
> > > Yeah, trying to figure out which should go through which tree.
> > > Christoph, should I also pickup 14? Or can that go through x86?
> >
> > Well, it appears to have dependencies so I doubt it can be kept
> > separate. In any case, provided all debugging is properly productized:
>
> 13/14 can be just merged. There are no dependencies on earlier
> patches.
>
> If you want to merge 18 then you would need to pick up also 15-17.
So I'm referring to the 'This is required' wording here:
| Subject: [PATCH 14/41] x86: Rename __this_cpu_xxx_# operations to
raw_cpu_xxx_#
|
| This is required now since the core portion expects a different
| naming.
|
| Change the names from __this_cpu_xxxx_# to raw_cpu_xxxx_#.
|
| Also changes the uses of the x86 percpu primitives in preempt.h.
|
| This is required now since the core portion expects a different naming.
By what is this required - by the previous patch #13?
Also, the changelog indicates it's two changes - please split the
patch in two if so.
(Tejun, please wait for this review to be complete before committing
anything.)
Thanks,
Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
