On Mon, 9 Dec 2013 20:11:54 +0800 Rui Xiang <rui.xi...@huawei.com> wrote:
> While getting proc task error, it shoule return -ESRCH. > > ... > > --- a/fs/proc/base.c > +++ b/fs/proc/base.c > @@ -174,9 +174,10 @@ static int get_task_root(struct task_struct *task, > struct path *root) > static int proc_cwd_link(struct dentry *dentry, struct path *path) > { > struct task_struct *task = get_proc_task(dentry->d_inode); > - int result = -ENOENT; > + int result = -ESRCH; I suppose so. But there is risk here of breaking existing applications and I don't think this problem is serious enough to justify that risk? -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/