On 2013/12/11 7:02, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Mon, 9 Dec 2013 20:11:54 +0800 Rui Xiang <rui.xi...@huawei.com> wrote:
>
>> While getting proc task error, it shoule return -ESRCH.
>>
>> ...
>>
>> --- a/fs/proc/base.c
>> +++ b/fs/proc/base.c
>> @@ -174,9 +174,10 @@ static int get_task_root(struct task_struct *task,
>> struct path *root)
>> static int proc_cwd_link(struct dentry *dentry, struct path *path)
>> {
>> struct task_struct *task = get_proc_task(dentry->d_inode);
>> - int result = -ENOENT;
>> + int result = -ESRCH;
>
> I suppose so. But there is risk here of breaking existing applications
> and I don't think this problem is serious enough to justify that risk?
>
Got it. Thanks for your comment.
Thanks
Rui
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
