* Paolo Ciarrocchi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, 24 Jan 2005 09:59:02 +0100, Ingo Molnar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> [...]
> > - CKRM is another possibility, and has nonzero costs as well, but solves
> > a wider range of problems.
>
> BTW, do you know what's the status of CKRM ? If I'm not wrong it is
> already widely used, is there any plan to push it to mainstream ?
it's a bit complex and thus not a no-brainer in terms of merging. Also,
the last version of it seems to be against 2.6.8.1. CKRM-cpu is in
essence an additional layer ontop of normal scheduling. Another patch in
this area is fairsched.
Ingo
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
