On Thu, Dec 19, 2013 at 06:38:54PM -0500, Benjamin LaHaise wrote:
 > On Thu, Dec 19, 2013 at 03:24:16PM -0500, Dave Jones wrote:
 > > Yes. Note the original trace in this thread was a 
 > > VM_BUG_ON(atomic_read(&page->_count) <= 0);
 > > 
 > > Right after these crashes btw, the box locks up solid. So bad that traces 
 > > don't
 > > always make it over usb-serial. Annoying.
 > 
 > I think I finally have an idea what's going on now.  Kent's changes in 
 > e34ecee2ae791df674dfb466ce40692ca6218e43 are broken and result in a memory 
 > leak of the aio kioctx.  This eventually leads to the system running out of 
 > memory, which ends up triggering the otherwise hard to hit error paths in 
 > aio_setup_ring().  Linus' suggested changes should fix the badness in the 
 > aio_setup_ring(), but more work has to be done to fix up the percpu 
 > reference counting tie in with the aio code.  I'll fix this up in the 
 > morning if nobody beats me to it over night, as I'm just heading out right 
 > now.

That would explain why I'm having difficulty repeating it in a hurry if it
takes hours of runtime for the leak to reach a point where it becomes a problem.

        Dave

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to