On Thu, Dec 19, 2013 at 02:37:22PM -0700, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 19, 2013 at 6:42 AM, Alexander Gordeev <agord...@redhat.com>
> wrote:
> > On Wed, Dec 18, 2013 at 11:58:47AM -0700, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> >> If rc == 13 and the device can only use 8, the extra 5 would be
> >> ignored and wasted.
> >>
> >> If the waste is unacceptable, the driver can try this:
> >>
> >> rc = pci_enable_msix_range(dev->pdev, dev->irqs, 16, 16);
> >> if (rc < 0) {
> >> rc = pci_enable_msix_range(dev->pdev, dev->irqs, 8, 8);
> >> if (rc < 0) {
> >> rc = pci_enable_msix_range(dev->pdev, dev->irqs, 4, 4);
> >> ...
> >> }
> >
> > I have troubles with this fallback logic. On each failed step we get an
> > error and we do not know if this is indeed an error or an indication of
> > insufficient MSI resources. Even -ENOSPC would not tell much, since it
> > could be thrown from a lower level.
> >
> > By contrast, with the tri-state return value we can distinguish and bail
> > out on errors right away.
>
> I thought the main point of this was to get rid of interfaces that
> were prone to misuse, and tri-state return values was a big part of
> that. All we really care about in the driver is success/failure. I'm
> not sure there's much to be gained by analyzing *why* we failed, and I
> think it tends to make uncommon error paths more complicated than
> necessary. If we fail four times instead of bailing out after the
> first failure, well, that doesn't sound terrible to me. The last
> failure can log the errno, which is enough for debugging.
Sure, the main point is to get rid of try-state interfaces. I just afraid
to throw out the baby with the bath water for unusual devices (which we do
not have in the tree).
I can only identify two downsides of the approach above - (a) repeated error
logging in a platform code (i.e. caused by -ENOMEM) and (b) repeated attempts
to enable MSI when the platform already reported a fatal error.
I think if a device needs an extra magic to enable MSI (i.e. writing to
specific registers etc.) it would be manageable with pci_enable_msix_range(),
but may be I am missing something?
So my thought is may be we deprecate the tri-state interfaces, but do not
do it immediately.
--
Regards,
Alexander Gordeev
agord...@redhat.com
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
