On Thu, Jan 09, 2014 at 04:28:49PM +0800, Jason Wang wrote:
> On 01/08/2014 10:40 PM, Neil Horman wrote:
> > On Wed, Jan 08, 2014 at 11:21:21AM +0800, Jason Wang wrote:
> >> On 01/07/2014 09:17 PM, Neil Horman wrote:
> >>> On Tue, Jan 07, 2014 at 11:42:24AM +0800, Jason Wang wrote:
> >>>> On 01/06/2014 08:42 PM, Neil Horman wrote:
> >>>>> On Mon, Jan 06, 2014 at 11:21:07AM +0800, Jason Wang wrote:
> >>>>>> Currently, the tx queue were selected implicitly in
> >>>>>> ndo_dfwd_start_xmit(). The
> >>>>>> will cause several issues:
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> - NETIF_F_LLTX was forced for macvlan device in this case which lead
> >>>>>> extra lock
> >>>>>> contention.
> >>>>>> - dev_hard_start_xmit() was called with NULL txq which bypasses the
> >>>>>> net device
> >>>>>> watchdog
> >>>>>> - dev_hard_start_xmit() does not check txq everywhere which will lead
> >>>>>> a crash
> >>>>>> when tso is disabled for lower device.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Fix this by explicitly introducing a select queue method just for l2
> >>>>>> forwarding
> >>>>>> offload (ndo_dfwd_select_queue), and introducing dfwd_direct_xmit() to
> >>>>>> do the
> >>>>>> queue selecting and transmitting for l2 forwarding.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> With this fixes, NETIF_F_LLTX could be preserved for macvlan and
> >>>>>> there's no need
> >>>>>> to check txq against NULL in dev_hard_start_xmit().
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> In the future, it was also required for macvtap l2 forwarding support
> >>>>>> since it
> >>>>>> provides a necessary synchronization method.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Cc: John Fastabend <john.r.fastab...@intel.com>
> >>>>>> Cc: Neil Horman <nhor...@tuxdriver.com>
> >>>>>> Cc: e1000-de...@lists.sourceforge.net
> >>>>>> Signed-off-by: Jason Wang <jasow...@redhat.com>
> >>>>> Instead of creating another operation here to do special queue
> >>>>> selection, why
> >>>>> not just have ndo_dfwd_start_xmit include a pointer to a pointer in its
> >>>>> argument
> >>>>> list, so it can pass the txq it used back to the caller
> >>>>> (dev_hard_start_xmit)?
> >>>>> ndo_dfwd_start_xmit already knows which queue set to pick from (since
> >>>>> their
> >>>>> reserved for the device doing the transmitting). It seems more clear
> >>>>> to me than
> >>>>> creating a new netdevice operation.
> >>>> See commit 8ffab51b3dfc54876f145f15b351c41f3f703195 ("macvlan: lockless
> >>>> tx path"). The point is keep the tx path lockless to be efficient and
> >>>> simplicity for management. And macvtap multiqueue was also implemented
> >>>> with this assumption. The real contention should be done in the txq of
> >>>> lower device instead of macvlan itself. This is also needed for
> >>>> multiqueue macvtap.
> >>> Ok, I see how you're preserving LLTX here, and thats great, but it doesn't
> >>> really buy us anything that I can see. If a macvlan is using hardware
> >>> acceleration, it needs to arbitrate access to that hardware. Weather
> >>> thats done
> >>> by locking the lowerdev's tx queue lock or by enforcing locking on the
> >>> macvlan
> >>> itself is equivalent. The decision to use dfwd hardware acceleration is
> >>> made on
> >>> open, so its not like theres any traffic that can avoid the lock, as it
> >>> all goes
> >>> through the hardware. All I see that this has bought us is an extra
> >>> net_device
> >>> method (which isn't a big deal, but not necessecary as I see it).
> >> As I replied to patch 1/2, looking at the code itself again. The locking
> >> on the lowerdev's tx queue is really need since we need synchronize with
> >> other control path. Two examples are dev watchdog and ixgbe_down() both
> >> of which will try to hold tx lock to synchronize the with transmission.
> >> Without holding the lowerdev tx lock, we may have more serious issues.
> >> Also, it's a little strange for a net device has two modes. Future
> >> developers need to care about two different tx lock paths which is sub
> >> optimal.
> >>
> > Ok, having looked at this for a few hours, I agree, locking in the lowerdev
> > has
> > some definiate advantages in plugging the holes you've pointed out.
> >
> >> For the issue of an extra net_device method, if you don't like we can
> >> reuse the ndo_select_queue by also passing the accel_priv to that method.
> > I do, that actually simplifies things, since it lets us use the entire
> > dev_hard_start_xmit path unmodified, which gives us the locking your
> > looking for
> > without having to create a new slimmed down variant of dev_hard_start_xmit.
> >
> > Regards
> > Neil
>
> Right, will post V2.
>
Thanks
Neil
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
