On 01/13/2014 07:02 PM, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> On Mon, 13 Jan 2014 14:20:59 +1100 Stephen Rothwell
> <s...@canb.auug.org.au> wrote:
>>
>> On Mon, 13 Jan 2014 14:18:24 +1100 Stephen Rothwell
>> <s...@canb.auug.org.au> wrote:
>>>
>>> Today's linux-next merge of the tip tree got conflicts in
>>> arch/arc/include/asm/Kbuild, arch/cris/include/asm/Kbuild,
>>> arch/hexagon/include/asm/Kbuild,
>>> arch/microblaze/include/asm/Kbuild,
>>> arch/parisc/include/asm/Kbuild and
>>> arch/score/include/asm/Kbuild between commit e3fec2f74f7f
>>> ("lib: Add missing arch generic-y entries for
>>> asm-generic/hash.h") from the net-next tree and commit
>>> 93ea02bb8435 ("arch: Clean up asm/barrier.h implementations
>>> using asm-generic/barrier.h") from the tip tree.
>>>
>>> I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary
>>> (no action is required).
>>>
>>> BTW: thanks for not keeping the Kbuild files sorted :-(
>>
>> I missed arch/mn10300/include/asm/Kbuild the first time round.
>
> And ... git rerere does not work well here. It stores resolutions
> by a hash of the (sanitised) conflict and since most of these files
> have exactly the same conflict, I am going to have to edit 5 of
> them by hand every day.
>
Well, you probably can keep a diff from the conflict-merge tree to the
fix, but still.
Is there a sensible way we can fix this in either net-next or tip?
-hpa
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
