On 01/17/2014 01:22 AM, Raghavendra K T wrote:

diff --git a/drivers/block/null_blk.c b/drivers/block/null_blk.c
index a2e69d2..6b0e049 100644
--- a/drivers/block/null_blk.c
+++ b/drivers/block/null_blk.c
@@ -535,6 +535,11 @@ static int null_add_dev(void)
        if (!nullb)
                return -ENOMEM;

+       if (bs > PAGE_SIZE) {
+               WARN(1, "Invalid block size. Setting it to 4096\n");
+               bs = 4096;
+       }
+

Use PAGESIZE instead, move it to null_init with the other checks and use pr_warn for issuing the warning.

        spin_lock_init(&nullb->lock);

        if (queue_mode == NULL_Q_MQ && use_per_node_hctx)
diff --git a/fs/buffer.c b/fs/buffer.c
index 6024877..029c698 100644
--- a/fs/buffer.c
+++ b/fs/buffer.c
@@ -883,6 +883,7 @@ struct buffer_head *alloc_page_buffers(struct page *page, 
unsigned long size,
        struct buffer_head *bh, *head;
        long offset;

+       BUG_ON(size > PAGE_SIZE);
  try_again:
        head = NULL;
        offset = PAGE_SIZE;
@@ -1571,6 +1572,7 @@ void create_empty_buffers(struct page *page,
        struct buffer_head *bh, *head, *tail;

        head = alloc_page_buffers(page, blocksize, 1);
+       BUG_ON(!head);
        bh = head;
        do {
                bh->b_state |= b_state;


It seems? that the physical sector size is always limited to the system page size.

Why not do the check in add_disk (or __blkdev_get) and fail there, instead of failing on the first partition check?



--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to