Despite the name mach-crag6410-module.c, the code is built for
MACH_WLF_CRAGG_6410 -- which is bool, and hence this code is
either present or absent.  It will never be modular, so using
module_init as an alias for __initcall can be somewhat
misleading.

Fix this up now, so that we can relocate module_init from
init.h into module.h in the future.  If we don't do this, we'd
have to add module.h to obviously non-modular code, and that
would be a worse thing.

Note that direct use of __initcall is discouraged, vs. one
of the priority categorized subgroups.  As __initcall gets
mapped onto device_initcall, our use of device_initcall
directly in this change means that the runtime impact is
zero -- it will remain at level 6 in initcall ordering.

Cc: Ben Dooks <ben-li...@fluff.org>
Cc: Kukjin Kim <kgene....@samsung.com>
Cc: Russell King <li...@arm.linux.org.uk>
Cc: patc...@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com
Cc: linux-arm-ker...@lists.infradead.org
Signed-off-by: Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortma...@windriver.com>
---
 arch/arm/mach-s3c64xx/mach-crag6410-module.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-s3c64xx/mach-crag6410-module.c 
b/arch/arm/mach-s3c64xx/mach-crag6410-module.c
index 7ccfef2..9c00d83 100644
--- a/arch/arm/mach-s3c64xx/mach-crag6410-module.c
+++ b/arch/arm/mach-s3c64xx/mach-crag6410-module.c
@@ -401,4 +401,4 @@ static int __init wlf_gf_module_register(void)
 {
        return i2c_add_driver(&wlf_gf_module_driver);
 }
-module_init(wlf_gf_module_register);
+device_initcall(wlf_gf_module_register);
-- 
1.8.4.1

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to