Subsystems that want to register CPU hotplug callbacks, as well as perform
initialization for the CPUs that are already online, often do it as shown
below:

        get_online_cpus();

        for_each_online_cpu(cpu)
                init_cpu(cpu);

        register_cpu_notifier(&foobar_cpu_notifier);

        put_online_cpus();

This is wrong, since it is prone to ABBA deadlocks involving the
cpu_add_remove_lock and the cpu_hotplug.lock (when running concurrently
with CPU hotplug operations).

Instead, the correct and race-free way of performing the callback
registration is:

        cpu_maps_update_begin();

        for_each_online_cpu(cpu)
                init_cpu(cpu);

        /* Note the use of the double underscored version of the API */
        __register_cpu_notifier(&foobar_cpu_notifier);

        cpu_maps_update_done();


Fix the sysfs code in sparc by using this latter form of callback
registration.

Cc: "David S. Miller" <da...@davemloft.net>
Cc: sparcli...@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Srivatsa S. Bhat <srivatsa.b...@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
---

 arch/sparc/kernel/sysfs.c |    6 +++++-
 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/arch/sparc/kernel/sysfs.c b/arch/sparc/kernel/sysfs.c
index c21c673..2177b9e 100644
--- a/arch/sparc/kernel/sysfs.c
+++ b/arch/sparc/kernel/sysfs.c
@@ -300,7 +300,7 @@ static int __init topology_init(void)
 
        check_mmu_stats();
 
-       register_cpu_notifier(&sysfs_cpu_nb);
+       cpu_maps_update_begin();
 
        for_each_possible_cpu(cpu) {
                struct cpu *c = &per_cpu(cpu_devices, cpu);
@@ -310,6 +310,10 @@ static int __init topology_init(void)
                        register_cpu_online(cpu);
        }
 
+       __register_cpu_notifier(&sysfs_cpu_nb);
+
+       cpu_maps_update_done();
+
        return 0;
 }
 

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to