Hi Srivatsa, On Wed, Feb 05, 2014 at 10:06:04PM +0000, Srivatsa S. Bhat wrote: > Subsystems that want to register CPU hotplug callbacks, as well as perform > initialization for the CPUs that are already online, often do it as shown > below: > > get_online_cpus(); > > for_each_online_cpu(cpu) > init_cpu(cpu); > > register_cpu_notifier(&foobar_cpu_notifier); > > put_online_cpus(); > > This is wrong, since it is prone to ABBA deadlocks involving the > cpu_add_remove_lock and the cpu_hotplug.lock (when running concurrently > with CPU hotplug operations).
Hmm, the code in question (for this patch) runs from an arch_initcall. How can you generate CPU hotplug operations at that stage? > Instead, the correct and race-free way of performing the callback > registration is: > > cpu_maps_update_begin(); > > for_each_online_cpu(cpu) > init_cpu(cpu); > > /* Note the use of the double underscored version of the API */ > __register_cpu_notifier(&foobar_cpu_notifier); > > cpu_maps_update_done(); > > > Fix the hw-breakpoint code in arm by using this latter form of callback > registration. I guess you introduce __register_cpu_notifier somewhere earlier in the series, so it's best if you take this all via your tree. Will -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
