From: Miklos Szeredi <mszer...@suse.cz>
Move the d_move() in vfs_rename_dir() up, similarly to how it's done in
vfs_rename_other(). The next patch will consolidate these two functions
and this is the only structural difference between them.
I'm not sure if doing the d_move() after the dput is even valid. But there
may be a logical explanation for that. But moving the d_move() before the
dput() (and the mutex_unlock()) should definitely not hurt.
Signed-off-by: Miklos Szeredi <mszer...@suse.cz>
---
fs/namei.c | 5 ++---
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/namei.c b/fs/namei.c
index 258c06ae26a7..1409090d0913 100644
--- a/fs/namei.c
+++ b/fs/namei.c
@@ -4018,13 +4018,12 @@ static int vfs_rename_dir(struct inode *old_dir, struct
dentry *old_dentry,
target->i_flags |= S_DEAD;
dont_mount(new_dentry);
}
+ if (!(old_dir->i_sb->s_type->fs_flags & FS_RENAME_DOES_D_MOVE))
+ d_move(old_dentry, new_dentry);
out:
if (target)
mutex_unlock(&target->i_mutex);
dput(new_dentry);
- if (!error)
- if (!(old_dir->i_sb->s_type->fs_flags & FS_RENAME_DOES_D_MOVE))
- d_move(old_dentry,new_dentry);
return error;
}
--
1.8.1.4
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
