On Sunday 09 February 2014, Randy Dunlap wrote: >On 02/09/2014 07:46 PM, Gene Heskett wrote: >> On Sunday 09 February 2014, Randy Dunlap wrote: >>> On 02/09/2014 07:07 PM, Ken Moffat wrote: >>>> On Sun, Feb 09, 2014 at 06:05:41PM -0500, Gene Heskett wrote: >>>>> On Sunday 09 February 2014, Paul Bolle wrote: >>>>>> Feel free to open a new thread, with the relevant details, and >>>>>> involve the relevant people and lists. I have no idea what you're >>>>>> going on about and could not care less (in the context of this >>>>>> thread). >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> Paul Bolle >>>>> >>>>> Been tried, got zero response. Frankly, posting just to lkml, >>>>> hoping the revalent people see it, is beginning to act like posting >>>>> to a black hole. >>>>> >>>> I saw one response to you, from Randy Dunlap, asking for more >>>> >>>> information : https://lkml.org/lkml/2014/2/8/153 >>> >>> wow, I don't know how I saw this message (thanks, Ken), >>> but replying to this patch was NOT the right thing to do, Gene. >>> >>> Just reply to my request and I'll be glad to look into it. >>> >>>> After your posts a few days ago, I'm tempted to suggest you check >>>> >>>> your spam filters, and also any mail files your virus scanner might >>>> have quarantined. But it is also possible that you just haven't >>>> received it - email is like that. >>>> >>>> ط¤آ¸en >> >> Spam and viri filters watched carefully. I also use mailfilter, and >> watch its logs full time for FP's. > >Still -- this ATSC problem should not be part of a reply to the Remove >DEPRECATED patch.
True. But I got some attention. >> And I didn't reply because the question seemed way too broad, almost as >> if > >what question seemed to broad? You wanted to see "a" config, but I wanted to show the diffs. Also yesterday I hadn't gone thru what I have yet to see where it falls apart. > >> my lament wasn't read. That and the mail server doesn't like big > >what mail server? yours? wdtv? vger.kernel.org certainly has no >problem with them. I have gotten bounced from lkml because a screen shot pix of a failed boot was too big. Perhaps 18 months or so. It was big, from a 10 megapixel camera. >> attachments. So rather than reply to the list, I'll excise some of the >> addresses that bounce from a reply_all or don't like me, and send the >> .config from a 3.019 build which seems ok, but by the time that config >> is run thru a make oldconfig at 3.8.2, most all the media, ATSC and >> DVB stuff is gone. So I'll attach that one too. The later file grew >> 22kb, but wholesale parts of the first one are missing from the 2nd. > >Gene, I want to make sure where you are saying the problem is. >Is it going directly from 3.019 to 3.8.2, with no intervening kernel >versions? No, one intermediate step in this case. I started with 3.0.19, which was fine, took that one to 3.2.40, and that one to 3.8.2 because I don't have anything between those here. Not exactly a step by step. >I don't know what kernel version 3.019 is. Do you mean 3.0.19? Yes, Joanne Dow would call that a typu for sure. Thanks Randy. Cheers, Gene -- "There are four boxes to be used in defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, and ammo. Please use in that order." -Ed Howdershelt (Author) Genes Web page <http://geneslinuxbox.net:6309/gene> NOTICE: Will pay 100 USD for an HP-4815A defective but complete probe assembly. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
