Hi! > On Thu, Feb 03, 2005 at 11:41:26AM +0100, Pavel Machek wrote: > > Okay, you are right, restoring it unconditionaly would be bad > > idea. Still it would be nice to tell cpufreq governor "please change > > the frequency ASAP" so it does not run at 800MHz for half an hour > > compiling kernels on AC power. > > It already does that... or at least it should. in cpufreq_resume() there is > a call to schedule_work(&cpu_policy->update); which will cause a call > cpufreq_update_policy() in due course. And cpufreq_update_policy() calls the > governor, and it is supposed to adjust the frequency to the user's wish > then.
Ok, so Rafael's suspend() routine seems like good fix... Please apply... Pavel -- People were complaining that M$ turns users into beta-testers... ...jr ghea gurz vagb qrirybcref, naq gurl frrz gb yvxr vg gung jnl! - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/