On 02/18/2014 02:39 AM, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
On Mon, Feb 17, 2014 at 03:41:22PM -0500, Waiman Long wrote:+void queue_spin_lock_slowpath(struct qspinlock *lock, int qsval) +{ + unsigned int cpu_nr, qn_idx; + struct qnode *node, *next; + u32 prev_qcode, my_qcode; + +#ifdef queue_spin_trylock_quick + /* + * Try the quick spinning code path + */ + if (queue_spin_trylock_quick(lock, qsval)) + return; +#endifwhy oh why?
I could take this #ifdef away. I just need to add a default version that always return 0.
+ /* + * Get the queue node + */ + cpu_nr = smp_processor_id(); + node = get_qnode(&qn_idx); + + if (unlikely(!node)) { + /* + * This shouldn't happen, print a warning message + *& busy spinning on the lock. + */ + printk_sched( + "qspinlock: queue node table exhausted at cpu %d!\n", + cpu_nr); + while (!queue_spin_trylock_unfair(lock)) + arch_mutex_cpu_relax(); + return; + } + + /* + * Set up the new cpu code to be exchanged + */ + my_qcode = _SET_QCODE(cpu_nr, qn_idx); + + /* + * Initialize the queue node + */ + node->wait = true; + node->next = NULL; + + /* + * The lock may be available at this point, try again if no task was + * waiting in the queue. + */ + if (!(qsval>> _QCODE_OFFSET)&& queue_spin_trylock(lock)) { + put_qnode(); + return; + } + +#ifdef queue_code_xchg + prev_qcode = queue_code_xchg(lock, my_qcode); +#else + /* + * Exchange current copy of the queue node code + */ + prev_qcode = atomic_xchg(&lock->qlcode, my_qcode); + /* + * It is possible that we may accidentally steal the lock. If this is + * the case, we need to either release it if not the head of the queue + * or get the lock and be done with it. + */ + if (unlikely(!(prev_qcode& _QSPINLOCK_LOCKED))) { + if (prev_qcode == 0) { + /* + * Got the lock since it is at the head of the queue + * Now try to atomically clear the queue code. + */ + if (atomic_cmpxchg(&lock->qlcode, my_qcode, + _QSPINLOCK_LOCKED) == my_qcode) + goto release_node; + /* + * The cmpxchg fails only if one or more tasks + * are added to the queue. In this case, we need to + * notify the next one to be the head of the queue. + */ + goto notify_next; + } + /* + * Accidentally steal the lock, release the lock and + * let the queue head get it. + */ + queue_spin_unlock(lock); + } else + prev_qcode&= ~_QSPINLOCK_LOCKED; /* Clear the lock bit */ + my_qcode&= ~_QSPINLOCK_LOCKED; +#endif /* queue_code_xchg */WTF is this #ifdef for?
The #ifdef is harder to take away here. The point is that doing a 32-bit exchange may accidentally steal the lock with the additional code to handle that. Doing a 16-bit exchange, on the other hand, will never steal the lock and so don't need the extra handling code. I could construct a function with different return values to handle the different cases if you think it will make the code easier to read.
+ if (prev_qcode) { + /* + * Not at the queue head, get the address of the previous node + * and set up the "next" fields of the that node. + */ + struct qnode *prev = xlate_qcode(prev_qcode); + + ACCESS_ONCE(prev->next) = node; + /* + * Wait until the waiting flag is off + */ + while (smp_load_acquire(&node->wait)) + arch_mutex_cpu_relax(); + } + + /* + * At the head of the wait queue now + */ + while (true) { + u32 qcode; + int retval; + + retval = queue_get_lock_qcode(lock,&qcode, my_qcode); + if (retval> 0) + ; /* Lock not available yet */ + else if (retval< 0) + /* Lock taken, can release the node& return */ + goto release_node; + else if (qcode != my_qcode) { + /* + * Just get the lock with other spinners waiting + * in the queue. + */ + if (queue_spin_trylock_unfair(lock)) + goto notify_next;Why is this an option at all?
Are you referring to the case (qcode != my_qcode)? This condition will be true if more than one tasks have queued up.
-Longman -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
