3.11.10.5 -stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------ From: "Martin K. Petersen" <[email protected]> commit 087787959ce851d7bbb19f10f6e9241b7f85a3ca upstream. Commit 9f060e2231ca changed the way we handle allocations for the integrity vectors. When the vectors are inline there is no associated slab and consequently bvec_nr_vecs() returns 0. Ensure that we check against BIP_INLINE_VECS in that case. Reported-by: David Milburn <[email protected]> Tested-by: David Milburn <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Martin K. Petersen <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Luis Henriques <[email protected]> --- fs/bio-integrity.c | 10 +++++++++- 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/fs/bio-integrity.c b/fs/bio-integrity.c index 45e944f..8dccf73 100644 --- a/fs/bio-integrity.c +++ b/fs/bio-integrity.c @@ -114,6 +114,14 @@ void bio_integrity_free(struct bio *bio) } EXPORT_SYMBOL(bio_integrity_free); +static inline unsigned int bip_integrity_vecs(struct bio_integrity_payload *bip) +{ + if (bip->bip_slab == BIO_POOL_NONE) + return BIP_INLINE_VECS; + + return bvec_nr_vecs(bip->bip_slab); +} + /** * bio_integrity_add_page - Attach integrity metadata * @bio: bio to update @@ -129,7 +137,7 @@ int bio_integrity_add_page(struct bio *bio, struct page *page, struct bio_integrity_payload *bip = bio->bi_integrity; struct bio_vec *iv; - if (bip->bip_vcnt >= bvec_nr_vecs(bip->bip_slab)) { + if (bip->bip_vcnt >= bip_integrity_vecs(bip)) { printk(KERN_ERR "%s: bip_vec full\n", __func__); return 0; } -- 1.9.0 -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
