On Mon, 24 Feb 2014, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 23, 2014 at 4:33 PM, Jingoo Han <[email protected]> wrote:
> > On Monday, February 24, 2014 6:40 AM, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> >>
> >> There is no reason to care about irq_desc in that context, escpecially
> >> as irq_data for that interrupt is retrieved as well.
> >>
> >> Use the proper accessor for the msi descriptor
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <[email protected]>
> >> Cc: Bjorn Helgaas <[email protected]>
> >> Cc: Jingoo Han <[email protected]>
> >> Cc: Mohit Kumar <[email protected]>
> >> Cc: pci <[email protected]>
> >
> > Acked-by: Jingoo Han <[email protected]>
>
> Acked-by: Bjorn Helgaas <[email protected]>
>
> Thomas, I assume you'll merge this along with the rest of your series.
> I don't have any pending changes in this area.
I can do, but it does not depend on anything else, so you can pick it
up as well. Either way is fine.
Thanks,
tglx
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
