On Wed, Feb 26, 2014 at 07:12:59PM +0700, Chris Bainbridge wrote:
> @@ -226,6 +234,15 @@ static void intel_workarounds(struct cpuinfo_x86 *c)
> clear_cpu_cap(c, X86_FEATURE_SEP);
>
> /*
> + * PAE CPUID bug: Pentium M reports no PAE but has PAE
> + */
> + if (forcepae) {
> + printk(KERN_WARNING "PAE forced!\n");
> + set_cpu_cap(c, X86_FEATURE_PAE);
> + add_taint(TAINT_MACHINE_CHECK, LOCKDEP_NOW_UNRELIABLE);
This is certainly the wrong taint flag. We'd need a new one or to
repurpose another one as I suggested in a previous mail.
--
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.
Sent from a fat crate under my desk. Formatting is fine.
--
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
