Hi Rashika,
On 26 February 2014 22:08, Rashika Kheria <rashika.khe...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Mark function as static in cpufreq.c because it is not
> used outside this file.
>
> This eliminates the following warning in cpufreq.c:
> drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c:355:9: warning: no previous prototype for
> 'show_boost' [-Wmissing-prototypes]
Can you please elaborate how this warning is related to
the non-static definition of this function?
> Signed-off-by: Rashika Kheria <rashika.khe...@gmail.com>
> ---
> drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c
> index 08ca8c9..54fd670 100644
> --- a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c
> +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c
> @@ -352,7 +352,7 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(cpufreq_notify_post_transition);
> /*********************************************************************
> * SYSFS INTERFACE *
> *********************************************************************/
> -ssize_t show_boost(struct kobject *kobj,
> +static ssize_t show_boost(struct kobject *kobj,
> struct attribute *attr, char *buf)
> {
> return sprintf(buf, "%d\n", cpufreq_driver->boost_enabled);
> --
> 1.7.9.5
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
