On Wed, Mar 05, 2014 at 03:55:50AM +0000, li.xi...@freescale.com wrote: > This adds the function of snd_soc_dai_set_tdm_slot_xlate, which is almost > One new signature of snd_soc_dai_set_tdm_slot discarding the mask > Parameters, which could be generated by itself.
Right, so that's not a bad thing but the _xlate() naming is confusing - Lars' point was that if a function is called _xlate() it would usually be an operation used as part of DT parsing, not something called from non-DT code. The new interface is probably a good thing but needs a different name (perhaps _simple or something?) or we need to rename the old one out of the way (it's slightly less flexible so we probably don't want to remove it totally). > And I want to provide one standard method for the drivers who are parsing > The TDM information from the DT node. This is a good goal.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
