RTAS manipulates its input and output arguments in big endian order. I have looked at factoring some lines with rtas_call() but it is not really worth it because of the variable arguments.
Signed-off-by: Greg Kurz <[email protected]> --- arch/powerpc/kernel/rtas.c | 15 +++++++++++++-- 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kernel/rtas.c b/arch/powerpc/kernel/rtas.c index 4cf674d..00dbe36 100644 --- a/arch/powerpc/kernel/rtas.c +++ b/arch/powerpc/kernel/rtas.c @@ -1020,6 +1020,7 @@ asmlinkage int ppc_rtas(struct rtas_args __user *uargs) char *buff_copy, *errbuf = NULL; int nargs; int rc; + int i; if (!capable(CAP_SYS_ADMIN)) return -EPERM; @@ -1056,9 +1057,19 @@ asmlinkage int ppc_rtas(struct rtas_args __user *uargs) flags = lock_rtas(); - rtas.args = args; + rtas.args.token = cpu_to_be32(args.token); + rtas.args.nargs = cpu_to_be32(args.nargs); + rtas.args.nret = cpu_to_be32(args.nret); + for (i = 0; i < nargs; ++i) + rtas.args.args[i] = cpu_to_be32(args.args[i]); + rtas.args.rets = &rtas.args.args[nargs]; + for (i = 0; i < args.nret; ++i) + rtas.args.rets[i] = 0; + enter_rtas(__pa(&rtas.args)); - args = rtas.args; + + for (i = 0; i < args.nret; ++i) + args.rets[i] = be32_to_cpu(rtas.args.rets[i]); /* A -1 return code indicates that the last command couldn't be completed due to a hardware error. */ -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
