On Fri, Feb 28, 2014 at 1:38 AM, Gross, Mark <mark.gr...@intel.com> wrote:
> So if you have the luxury of being able to influence (file bugs against or > write) > the platform enumeration ABI then with ACPI you can have a named gpio today. > Note: there is an expectation that the _PRP feature to go into the next > version > of ACPI and that should enable a trivial 1-1 mapping (when _prp is used by the > ACPI platform) between the different platform enumeration API's (DT and ACPI). Oh I wasn't aware. This makes things better, and gives con_id a clear usecase in the ACPI probe path as well. [Stephen] >> If there were ever an (upstream?) ACPI "binding"(?) for the Tegra SDHCI >> controller, I would hope it would use the exact same names for the GPIO >> signals. > > me to! Amen to that. Yours, Linus Walleij -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
