On Fri, Mar 07, 2014 at 02:52:06AM +0000, Al Viro wrote: > On Thu, Mar 06, 2014 at 03:47:26PM -0500, Tejun Heo wrote: > > > Not much, but it should at least help bisection if something goes > > wrong, I think. > > OK. It looks better when folding pcpu_split_block() into the caller > is done as the first step. See the attached 3 patches - combination > is the same, modulo comment addition and switching seen_free to bool.
All look good to me. Applying them to percpu/for-3.15. Thanks. -- tejun -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
