On Thu, Mar 13, 2014 at 10:12:02AM +0000, Will Deacon wrote: > On Wed, Mar 12, 2014 at 05:45:20PM +0000, Catalin Marinas wrote: > > On Wed, Mar 12, 2014 at 01:42:51PM +0100, Jean Pihet wrote: > > > On 13 February 2014 18:06, Jean Pihet <jean.pi...@linaro.org> wrote: > > > > This patch hooks in the perf_regs and libunwind code for ARM64. > > > > The tools/perf/arch/arm64 is created; it contains the arch specific > > > > code for DWARF unwinding. > > > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Jean Pihet <jean.pi...@linaro.org> > > > > Acked-by: Will Deacon <will.dea...@arm.com> > > > > > > Ping on this patch. Can this one go into the perf tree? > > > > I'm happy to take it as well if there are no objections from the perf > > maintainers. > > I object :) Last time I took a patch for perf tools (via the arm tree) it > ended in a conflict from hell and we vowed not to take tools patches via > arch trees again.
Works for me ;) -- Catalin -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
