On Thu, 13 Mar 2014, Hans de Goede wrote: > Hi, > > On 03/13/2014 03:32 PM, Thomas Gleixner wrote: > > On Thu, 13 Mar 2014, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote: > >> One side note: Since we need to specify IRQCHIP_EOI_THREADED and > >> handle_fasteoi_late_irq() as the handler, would it be easily doable to use > >> the handle_fasteoi_irq() handler and skip the EOI in the threaded mode? > >> But if it creates a mess then leave it as it is. > > > > Yeah, I was looking into that already. Patch below. > > > > To resemble the late version you need to add IRQCHIP_EOI_THREADED and > > IRQCHIP_EOI_IF_HANDLED to your irq chip. > > Just gave this a review (in as far as I'm qualified to review core irq > code), looks good and I agree this is an improvement over the previous > version. > > There is one behavioral change for irq-chips not setting the new > IRQCHIP_EOI_THREADED flag hiding in there. > > Before if the conditional unmask conditions were true for the > ONESHOT case the code would do: "unmask; eoi", now it does > "eoi; unmask" I believe the new behavior is more correct, but, since > it is a behavior change I thought I should point this out. > > I've also given this a test-run on sun4i and it works as advertised. > > FWIW, this patch is: > Reviewed-by: Hans de Goede <[email protected]> > Tested-by: Hans de Goede <[email protected]> > > I'll include this in v3 of my irq-sun4i patch-set as it is a dependency > there.
Sure, I split it up afterwards :) -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
