* Peter Zijlstra <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 18, 2014 at 04:56:44PM +0800, Yan, Zheng wrote:
> > This patch adds support for building Intel uncore driver as module.
> > It adds clean-up code and config option for the Intel uncore driver
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Yan, Zheng <[email protected]>
> > ---
> > arch/x86/Kconfig | 7 ++++
> > arch/x86/configs/i386_defconfig | 1 +
> > arch/x86/configs/x86_64_defconfig | 1 +
> > arch/x86/kernel/cpu/Makefile | 3 +-
> > arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel_uncore.c | 48
> > ++++++++++++++++++++++++---
> > 5 files changed, 55 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/arch/x86/Kconfig b/arch/x86/Kconfig
> > index 0af5250..8e4e247 100644
> > --- a/arch/x86/Kconfig
> > +++ b/arch/x86/Kconfig
> > @@ -1103,6 +1103,13 @@ config X86_CPUID
> > with major 203 and minors 0 to 31 for /dev/cpu/0/cpuid to
> > /dev/cpu/31/cpuid.
> >
> > +config X86_INTEL_UNCORE
> > + tristate "Intel uncore performance monitoring support"
> > + depends on CPU_SUP_INTEL
> > + ---help---
> > + This adds a driver to access the Uncore performance monitoring Units
> > + of Intel processors.
> > +
>
> Ingo do you agree with this config option placement?
Yeah, the modularization looks mostly good to me, but its name should
lie within the PERF namespace, i.e. CONFIG_PERF_PMU_X86_INTEL_UNCORE=y.
Thanks,
Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
