Hi, On 20/03/2014 at 17:21:00 +0100, Alexandre Belloni wrote : > Hi Rob, > > On 19/03/2014 at 11:14:43 -0500, Rob Herring wrote : > > On Wed, Mar 19, 2014 at 5:26 AM, Alexandre Belloni > > <alexandre.bell...@free-electrons.com> wrote: > > > Avoids getting the newly introduced warning: > > > WARNING: DT compatible string "atmel,at91sam9g45-adc" appears > > > un-documented -- check ./Documentation/devicetree/bindings/ > > > + compatible = "atmel,at91sam9g45-adc"; > > > > > > Introduced by: > > > bff5da433525 checkpatch: add DT compatible string documentation checks > > > > We should fix checkpatch instead. There are some fixes in progress, > > but I don't think it covers this issue. I'm puzzled by this one as I > > thought I checked for this case. > > > > Will someone take care of it ? I'm not sure how you want to handle that > as <chip> is replacing different values depending on the context. Also, > while for atmel and freescale, it is replacing the full chip name, that > is not the case for nvidia... >
Also, I found that naughty one: WARNING: DT compatible string vendor "fixed-clock" appears un-documented -- check ./Documentation/devicetree/bindings/vendor-prefixes.txt and WARNING: DT compatible string vendor "fixed-factor-clock" appears un-documented -- check ./Documentation/devicetree/bindings/vendor-prefixes.txt -- Alexandre Belloni, Free Electrons Embedded Linux, Kernel and Android engineering http://free-electrons.com -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/