On Wed, 05 Mar 2014 21:00:56 +0900
Masami Hiramatsu <masami.hiramatsu...@hitachi.com> wrote:
> kernel/kprobes.c | 61
> +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------
> 1 file changed, 53 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/kernel/kprobes.c b/kernel/kprobes.c
> index a21b4e6..3214289 100644
> --- a/kernel/kprobes.c
> +++ b/kernel/kprobes.c
> @@ -2249,6 +2249,46 @@ static const struct file_operations
> debugfs_kprobes_operations = {
> .release = seq_release,
> };
>
> +/* kprobes/blacklist -- shows which functions can not be probed */
> +static void *kprobe_blacklist_seq_start(struct seq_file *m, loff_t *pos)
> +{
> + return seq_list_start(&kprobe_blacklist, *pos);
> +}
> +
> +static void *kprobe_blacklist_seq_next(struct seq_file *m, void *v, loff_t
> *pos)
> +{
> + return seq_list_next(v, &kprobe_blacklist, pos);
> +}
> +
Can modules use NOKPROBE_SYMBOL() and have items being added to the
list as this is being read? That is, do we need locks?
Also, are items removed. I need to go back and look at the
implementation of NOKPROBE_SYMBOL(), I'm just writing this as I think
about it ;-)
-- Steve
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
