One of the comments in tick_handle_periodic() had 'when' instead of 'which' (My
guess :)). Fix it.
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.ku...@linaro.org>
---
kernel/time/tick-common.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/kernel/time/tick-common.c b/kernel/time/tick-common.c
index 20b2fe3..791a3a2 100644
--- a/kernel/time/tick-common.c
+++ b/kernel/time/tick-common.c
@@ -118,7 +118,7 @@ void tick_handle_periodic(struct clock_event_device *dev)
* to be sure we're using a real hardware clocksource.
* Otherwise we could get trapped in an infinite
* loop, as the tick_periodic() increments jiffies,
- * when then will increment time, posibly causing
+ * which then will increment time, posibly causing
* the loop to trigger again and again.
*/
if (timekeeping_valid_for_hres())
--
1.7.12.rc2.18.g61b472e
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
