On Mon, Mar 31, 2014 at 09:45:43PM +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> On Mon, 31 Mar 2014, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> 
> > On Mon, Mar 31, 2014 at 7:49 AM, Ingo Molnar <[email protected]> wrote:
> > > Neil Horman (1):
> > >       x86: Adjust irq remapping quirk for older revisions of 5500/5520 
> > > chipsets
> > 
> > Before I pull this, I want somebody to double-check it:
> > 
> > > -       if (revision == 0x13)
> > > +       if (revision < 0x13)
> > >                 set_irq_remapping_broken();
> > 
> > This change does *not* match the comment just above it. The comment
> > talks very much about revision 13.
> > 
> > So the comment should be fixed, and/or that "< 0x13" should perhaps be
> > "<= 0x13".
> > 
> > Because making it "less than" simply makes no sense in light of the
> > comment. Does revision 13 suddenly work? Was that where it was fixed?
> > If so, please fix the comment.
> 
> That is my bad. I applied V1 of the patch instead of V2 which had the
> <= 0x13 instead of < 0x13.
> 
> Please drop the pull request for now. I'll fix it up and we resubmit.
> 
> Thanks,
> 
>       tglx
> 
> 
What Thomas said.  That was caught and fixed already.  sorry for the noise.
Neil

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to