Robin wrote:
> for the second process and then from node 8 to node 4 for the second.
"for the second ... for the second"
I couldn't make sense of this statement. Should one of those
seconds be a first; what word(s) are elided after the second
"second"?
--
I won't rest till it's the best ...
Programmer, Linux Scalability
Paul Jackson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 1.650.933.1373,
1.925.600.0401
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
