On 03/26/2014 12:35 PM, Taras Kondratiuk wrote:
> On 01/08/2014 02:39 AM, Tony Lindgren wrote:
>> * Taras Kondratiuk <[email protected]> [131223 10:20]:
>>> On 23 December 2013 20:10, Taras Kondratiuk <[email protected]>
>>> wrote:
>>>> This series does trivial replacement of __raw_xxx functions with
>>>> xxx_relaxed
>>>> endian-neutral variants in 'mach-omap2' and 'plat-omap' directories.
>>>> Some code here most probably won't be used in BE mode (like debug-leds for
>>>> OMAP1 boards), but changes are made anyway to remove __raw_xxx() functions
>>>> completely and simplify future grep'ing for new __raw_xxx() entries.
>>
>> Sorry for the delay on these, applying into omap-for-v3.14/be.
>> These are trivial, and it's actually nice that you left out the
>> assembly related changes as those should be acked by the PM
>> people in case there are some issues dealing with the ROM code
>> etc.
>
> Hi Tony,
>
> It seems omap-for-v3.14/be didn't get into 3.14-rc8.
> Is there any issue with them?
This series conflicts now with clock changes which got into 3.14.
Resolution is trivial - just skip conflicting changes.
omap2_clk_{real,writel} already uses {readl,writel}_relaxed inside.
Do I need to push an updated series?
--
Taras Kondratiuk
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
