Hi! > > and there's no good > > reason to believe that this behavior would have persisted > > indefinitely. > > > > The msync(2) man page (as currently written in man-pages.git) is > > silent on the behavior if both flags are unset, so this change should > > not break an application written by somone who carefully reads the > > Linux man pages or the POSIX spec. > > Sadly, people do not always carefully read man pages, so there > remains the chance that a change like this will break applications. > Aside from standards conformance, what do you see as the benefit > of the change?
I've looked around Linux Test Project and this change will break a few testcases, but nothing that couldn't be easily fixed. The rest of the world may be more problematic though. -- Cyril Hrubis chru...@suse.cz -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
