On Tue, Apr 01, 2014 at 11:32:45AM -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 01, 2014 at 02:04:14PM -0400, Dave Jones wrote:
> > On Tue, Apr 01, 2014 at 10:55:45AM -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote:

[ . . . ]

> >  > Waiting uninterruptibly.  Presumably blocked on mutex_lock().  But
> >  > you have CONFIG_PROVE_LOCKING(), so any deadlocks should have been
> >  > reported.
> > 
> > Lockdep had reported something a little earlier (timestamped at 1108.xxxxxx)
> > but that's a known false-positive in xfs.
> 
> Yep, I would be very surprised if that was related to the grace-period hang.

Ah, but it could be suppressing later lockdep splats.  So if this can be
reproduced without xfs, we might get additional information from lockdep.

                                                        Thanx, Paul

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to