On Mon, 2014-04-07 at 09:46 +0100, Liviu Dudau wrote: > > *My* strategy is to get rid of pci_domain_nr(). I don't see why we need > to have arch specific way of providing the number, specially after looking > at the existing implementations that return a value from a variable that > is never touched or incremented. My guess is that pci_domain_nr() was > created to work around the fact that there was no domain_nr maintainance in > the generic code.
Well, there was no generic host bridge structure. There is one now, it should go there. Cheers, Ben. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
