On 9 April 2014 20:01, Steven Rostedt <rost...@goodmis.org> wrote: > Ouch! You are correct, this part of the patch makes no sense. That's > what I get for reviewing a patch and not looking at all the code around > the changes. (another kernel developer hangs head in shame :-( ) > > I think that if statement should be nuked.
Hmm, my opinion differs here :) If we completely remove this statement, we will run tick_nohz_switch_to_nohz() even if nohz is not enabled. And check for enabled must stay. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
