On Wed, 9 Apr 2014 11:31:43 -0400 Steven Rostedt <rost...@goodmis.org> wrote:
> > Hmm, looking at the code, I see it probably should still do the check. > > OK, nevermind ;-) Reading even more of the code, now I'm totally confused :-) When tick_setup_sched_timer() is called, if tick_nohz_enabled is set, then we set tick_nohz_active. This gets called by hrtimer_switch_to_hres(), and before that is called, the tick_check_oneshot_changed() will never get to the tick_nohz_switch_to_nohz() call. Looks to me, the real answer is to nuke both the if statement *and* the setting of the tick_nohz_active in that function. Both looks a bit redundant to me. -- Steve -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
