On Thu, Apr 10, 2014 at 06:19:55PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > On Wed, Apr 09, 2014 at 09:49:57PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > > Anyway, I'll look over the stuff tomorrow. > > That patch was missing useful clues.. > > Also, I shot __for_each_thread in the head, it seemed useless.
Hmm, do we really want to have for_each_process_thread() ? Having people explicitly write: for_each_process(p) { for_each_thread(p, t) { } } isn't that much more effort and its a whole lot more explicit on the double loop thing. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/